Being a T Mobile customer. This has been one of the worst news I've received in a long time.
As former customer of ATT I can state I NEVER would like to do business with them again. Their service is the Worst I've experienced in the World. Customer support is only available during business hours, and you will find your self chasing your tail trying to get support. You will always have to review your bill in order to make sure they have not overcharged you.
Most people that leave ATT, will see their bills go down at least 50 dollars per month for a similar service (this includes Verizon!). That in itself sais a lot.
I wish T Mobile would have given its customers the option of paying up 1200 dollars each to own T Mobile. The offer would be superior to ATT's and it would be all cash for Deutsche Telekom.
Deutsche Telekom is protecting is shareholder interests, but not its customers like that state on their memo. Believe us, most T Mobile customers are with T Mobile because we don't want anything to do with ATT.
If any of you would like to join in on efforts to make an alternate bid. Contact me through twitter. My nick is ViuMobile there.
Showing posts with label viumobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label viumobile. Show all posts
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Why Android has Prevailed? It provides innovating solutions!
Back in July 2010, I predicted that by Feb 2011 Android would reach Apple in the number of available apps. Missed this target by a couple months. That doesn't take away the fact that Android will overtake iPhone apps by a large margin this year. Actually if the current trend persist, over 30K apps per month, Android will have added over 300K apps this year alone, more than doubling the amount of applications iPhone has to offer, without any end in sight.
So Apple has redefined its strategy and its stating that they have better content. Unfortunately this is another area where Apple will falter again. The reason is simple, they are not leading in any technical aspect and they have started to follow Android's lead. If iPhone 5 does not change this, Apple's lack of hardware/software innovation will leave them vulnerable. Apple invented this market with a lead envied by other for over two years. But like many large corporations it was slow to change, just as Microsoft was before it.
When the G1 came out, it had copy/paste, multitasking and other features iPhone 3G lacked. Savvy programmers (cyanogenmod / eugen, etc) gave Android the ability to tether. Google provided Android navigation that became a standard for most people that travel, avoiding the need for a separate device to find an address. All this made Android popular and allowed its tide to grow.
These innovations did not exists under the iPhone ecosystem. It took two years for Apple to catch up. This year it has finally given iPhone the ability to provide a hotspot, still a higher cost (ATT police at work!, no doubt, Verizon will follow, its lost revenue). Apple's stance on Adobe Flash will have to change, as it only provides part of the Internet experience. This will cost Apple lost opportunities.
Currently Android systems are being used for more than just phones. The OS has become pervasive in all aspects of technology because of its open nature. You already see Android on TV sets and washing machines. It wont be long before low cost Android tablets replace many auto dashboards, some with very impressive capabilities like night vision. Android's technical lead spawns many areas beyond hardware/software, it includes more than just the smartphone/tablet markets. This is Apple's Achilles heel.
When considering how much money and research Android has behind it, across so many manufacturers. That tide is considerably larger than what Apple can provide on its own, even if its the most profitable business in the World. Apple will be forced to change its philosophy as well as business practices if it plans to be relevant long term. The 30% cut they ask for only makes matters worse for them in the long run.
Android is not without its share of problems, mainly due to litigation from Oracle. Behind the scenes, other competitors actively pursue to topple GNU General Public License undercutting Androids roots. Android is at odds with Linux GPL term itself! Both Google and Open Handset Alliance partners have been careless in the development of current affairs. The good news for users is that the tide is too strong and can't be derailed in the short term.
Apple has a very nice interface, but seldom provides solutions for its users. If it does, it does so at a higher cost or limitations. Android has gained acceptance and leads across all markets because it provides innovating solutions. Android has made most of its users happy, even with its share of wrinkles.
So Apple has redefined its strategy and its stating that they have better content. Unfortunately this is another area where Apple will falter again. The reason is simple, they are not leading in any technical aspect and they have started to follow Android's lead. If iPhone 5 does not change this, Apple's lack of hardware/software innovation will leave them vulnerable. Apple invented this market with a lead envied by other for over two years. But like many large corporations it was slow to change, just as Microsoft was before it.
When the G1 came out, it had copy/paste, multitasking and other features iPhone 3G lacked. Savvy programmers (cyanogenmod / eugen, etc) gave Android the ability to tether. Google provided Android navigation that became a standard for most people that travel, avoiding the need for a separate device to find an address. All this made Android popular and allowed its tide to grow.
These innovations did not exists under the iPhone ecosystem. It took two years for Apple to catch up. This year it has finally given iPhone the ability to provide a hotspot, still a higher cost (ATT police at work!, no doubt, Verizon will follow, its lost revenue). Apple's stance on Adobe Flash will have to change, as it only provides part of the Internet experience. This will cost Apple lost opportunities.Currently Android systems are being used for more than just phones. The OS has become pervasive in all aspects of technology because of its open nature. You already see Android on TV sets and washing machines. It wont be long before low cost Android tablets replace many auto dashboards, some with very impressive capabilities like night vision. Android's technical lead spawns many areas beyond hardware/software, it includes more than just the smartphone/tablet markets. This is Apple's Achilles heel.
Android is not without its share of problems, mainly due to litigation from Oracle. Behind the scenes, other competitors actively pursue to topple GNU General Public License undercutting Androids roots. Android is at odds with Linux GPL term itself! Both Google and Open Handset Alliance partners have been careless in the development of current affairs. The good news for users is that the tide is too strong and can't be derailed in the short term.
Apple has a very nice interface, but seldom provides solutions for its users. If it does, it does so at a higher cost or limitations. Android has gained acceptance and leads across all markets because it provides innovating solutions. Android has made most of its users happy, even with its share of wrinkles.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Who has the fastest 3G/4G network in the US.?
Having used all four networks, like most, I favor T Mobile because they actually provide speeds up to 4mpbs on any of their Android handsets or a lot better (up to 10mbps on the G2!).
Vibrant Speed on T Mobile
Sprint comes in second with a top speed of 4Mbps with its WiMax. Provided it doesn't rain or snow. Because their "pipes" that they boast so much, barely work if the front end doesn't work. WiMax is very susceptible to interference by snow or rain.
Price wise, T Mobile offers the best deal as for 70 dollars if offers all that Sprint does plus landline calling, that Sprint imposes harsh limits on.
Both these networks work great in Metro areas but nowhere else. Do have to give Sprint an edge for better speeds on interstates, though by next year T Mobile promises to double the speeds and provide these in rural areas as well. We shall have to wait and see if they deliver what they promised.
The other advantage that Sprint users have, is that they can get unlimited usage for 10 dollars more. T Mobile should take notice of this. No restrictions!
Verizon doesn't have the fastest network, even if they have LTE in a very limited amount of markets. There are no handsets available to use it. Regardless, they do provide the most consistent service through out the continental US, even in remote areas. This is their best asset until T Mob delivers on their promise. If you work in rural areas, this is your best option at the highest price.
Then we have ATT, their rocket dongles barely reach 400kbps, iPhones will sometimes reach 1.2mbps. and they overcharge you for every service, remember your early termination contract? or if you exceed your monthly quota?. They state they have HSPA+, though I have yet to see any device of theirs exceed 1.2mbps. Even if they actually delivered HSPA+ 14.4mpbs which is slower than T Mobs HSPA+ 21mbps. Their network doesn't actually provide this service to their users. They state they have the fastest mobile broadband network in the Nation, I have never seen any of their devices cross 5mbps, that T Mobile does, or 4mpbs that Sprint does. Of all service providers, this is the one that offers the least, yet charges the most. You are better off with any other choice.
Do any of these providers offer 4G, the answer is no. The one that comes closest though is TMobile as they actually proivde 21mpbs which is closer to the 100mbps requirement for this definition in Wikipedia. Does Sprint qualify, no it doesn't, cause it doesn't come even close to it. Does Verizon LTE qualify, if it worked, it would not fit ITU's definition of Wifi. The day any of these providers offer 100mbps download on your phone with voice and data simultaneously available providing ipV6 standards, we can start talking about 4G. Until then, they all are something above 3.5G and less than 4G, with the exception of ATT who's HSPA+ network (14.4mbps) is 3.5G the slowest and most outdated of them all.
Please vote below and add your comments. If possible provide a link to your speedtest and don't use Wifi as its clearly visible within Speedtest if you do, the provider is clearly shown.
Friday, July 9, 2010
Android will have more Apps than iPhone by Jan 2011
On July 7th, AndroLib reports that Android has over 82,000 applications (61.9% Free) while Apple comfortable lead with 226,782 active apps reported by 148Appz.biz with Apple having a significant jump this past month.
Though, when you analyze the underlying data, using a logarithmic curve to account for exponential growth, an interesting trend shows up (observe the graph on the right). Projection show that Android stands to overtake iPhone in number of Apps, sometime in January if the trends continue as they have the past year.
Apple has four times as many developers compared to Android. Interesting to note that Google and Android developers seem to be more productive than Apple developers.
Indeed, in order to obtain the quality seen in iPhone applications, more time is required. Though the observed productivity difference can't just be attributed to this fact.
It would be interesting to determine if Apple's approval process may be the reason why productivity between both camps is considerably different.
Either way, Android will most likely overtake iPhone Applications some time in 2011. This coupled with the issues observed by some with Apple 4G has taken luster away from Apple's main source of revenue.
Apple decided to barely matched Android features this year, instead it opted to provide others like retina display and a limited version of multitasking. This may become a critical issue down the road, specially when Apple fans suggest Android features are a main part of their wish list.
Apple is facing tough competition from Android on many fronts:
Though, when you analyze the underlying data, using a logarithmic curve to account for exponential growth, an interesting trend shows up (observe the graph on the right). Projection show that Android stands to overtake iPhone in number of Apps, sometime in January if the trends continue as they have the past year.
Apple has four times as many developers compared to Android. Interesting to note that Google and Android developers seem to be more productive than Apple developers.Indeed, in order to obtain the quality seen in iPhone applications, more time is required. Though the observed productivity difference can't just be attributed to this fact.
It would be interesting to determine if Apple's approval process may be the reason why productivity between both camps is considerably different.
Either way, Android will most likely overtake iPhone Applications some time in 2011. This coupled with the issues observed by some with Apple 4G has taken luster away from Apple's main source of revenue.
Apple decided to barely matched Android features this year, instead it opted to provide others like retina display and a limited version of multitasking. This may become a critical issue down the road, specially when Apple fans suggest Android features are a main part of their wish list.
Apple is facing tough competition from Android on many fronts:
- Innovation
- Applications
- Quality
- Security
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)